JPEG XL vs AVIF for web use-cases
- JPEG XL has now landed in all major browsers, so I figured I'd take a closer look at what it's good/bad at compared to other formats.
- Conclusions I'll go into full detail, with examples and benchmarks, but for those of you who don't have the time, here are the headlines: For lossy photos on the web, AVIF almost always produces smaller files than JPEG XL.
- At default effort settings, the best JPEG XL version is typically 15–25% larger than the equivalent AVIF.
Unverified
- JPEG XL has now landed in all major browsers, so I figured I'd take a closer look at what it's good/bad at compared to other formats.
- Conclusions I'll go into full detail, with examples and benchmarks, but for those of you who don't have the time, here are the headlines: For lossy photos on the web, AVIF almost always produces smaller files than JPEG XL.
- At default effort settings, the best JPEG XL version is typically 15–25% larger than the equivalent AVIF.
Sources: Jakearchibald