Two Michigan neighbours agreed to split the cost of removing trees that threatened a barn, but the work never happened; after a $2,000 dispute, an appeals court ruled the homeowner could not sue over the same trees
- Hagopian went to court after the trees were not removed and his money was not returned.
- (AI image)A disagreement between two neighbours in Michigan over trees that threatened a barn has ended with an appeals court ruling against the homeowner who wanted them removed.
- Seth Merle and Richard Hagopian had agreed to pay $2,000 each to remove the trees, but the work never happened.
Unverified
- Hagopian went to court after the trees were not removed and his money was not returned.
- (AI image)A disagreement between two neighbours in Michigan over trees that threatened a barn has ended with an appeals court ruling against the homeowner who wanted them removed.
- Seth Merle and Richard Hagopian had agreed to pay $2,000 each to remove the trees, but the work never happened.
Sources: Times of India