United Airlines argues a ‘window seat’ doesn’t have to be by the window during a legal fight
- United Airlines must face a class-action lawsuit after a federal judge rejected the airline’s attempt to dismiss claims from passengers who say they paid extra for “window seats” that had no actual windows.
- The lawsuit, which also names Delta Air Lines, alleges the airlines misled customers by failing to disclose during booking that some window seats on Boeing 737s, 757s and Airbus A321s are located beside blank cabin walls instead of windows.
- Judge James Donato in San Francisco rejected Chicago-based United’s argument that “window seat” refers only to a seat’s position, no
Unverified
- United Airlines must face a class-action lawsuit after a federal judge rejected the airline’s attempt to dismiss claims from passengers who say they paid extra for “window seats” that had no actual windows.
- The lawsuit, which also names Delta Air Lines, alleges the airlines misled customers by failing to disclose during booking that some window seats on Boeing 737s, 757s and Airbus A321s are located beside blank cabin walls instead of windows.
- Judge James Donato in San Francisco rejected Chicago-based United’s argument that “window seat” refers only to a seat’s position, no
Sources: The Independent